Fish Heads, Fish Heads Revisited

Presenter Information

Rhianna McBride
Malinda Mosher

Document Type

Oral Presentation

Campus where you would like to present

SURC Ballroom A

Start Date

17-5-2012

End Date

17-5-2012

Abstract

Our experiment is based on an experiment previously performed by Dr. Lubinski shown in the article “Fish Heads, Fish Heads: An Experiment on Differential Bone Preservation” published in the Journal of Archaeological Science. The purpose of our experiment was to see effects of acidic, alkaline, and H2O solutions on the vertebra and select cranial bones of three tilapia specimens over a 12 day period as well as which sections of bones were preserved the best under the circumstances. It is important to understand the effects that different laboratory conditions have on skeletal remains being studied for the benefits of zooarchaeology and other natural sciences. The methods that we performed differently from Dr. Lubinski’s experiment were based on time constraints and the chemical solutions used, as well as adding a control group (H2O), the latter of which the original experiment did not have. Our theory was that the bones would show the most extreme changes in the acidic solution, the alkaline would produce less of a change than acid and the bones submerged in H2O would show the least change. We used a .05 mol of sodium citrate tribasic dihydrate with 98% titration as the basis of both the acidic and basic solutions to submerge our specimens. Our results showed that the vertebra had the highest percent of change, especially in the acidic solution, the opposite of what occurred in the original experiment.

Poster Number

37

Faculty Mentor(s)

Patrick Lubinski

Additional Mentoring Department

Anthropology

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
May 17th, 8:30 AM May 17th, 11:00 AM

Fish Heads, Fish Heads Revisited

SURC Ballroom A

Our experiment is based on an experiment previously performed by Dr. Lubinski shown in the article “Fish Heads, Fish Heads: An Experiment on Differential Bone Preservation” published in the Journal of Archaeological Science. The purpose of our experiment was to see effects of acidic, alkaline, and H2O solutions on the vertebra and select cranial bones of three tilapia specimens over a 12 day period as well as which sections of bones were preserved the best under the circumstances. It is important to understand the effects that different laboratory conditions have on skeletal remains being studied for the benefits of zooarchaeology and other natural sciences. The methods that we performed differently from Dr. Lubinski’s experiment were based on time constraints and the chemical solutions used, as well as adding a control group (H2O), the latter of which the original experiment did not have. Our theory was that the bones would show the most extreme changes in the acidic solution, the alkaline would produce less of a change than acid and the bones submerged in H2O would show the least change. We used a .05 mol of sodium citrate tribasic dihydrate with 98% titration as the basis of both the acidic and basic solutions to submerge our specimens. Our results showed that the vertebra had the highest percent of change, especially in the acidic solution, the opposite of what occurred in the original experiment.