Effects of Alternative Outcome Scenarios and Structured Outcome Evaluation on Case-Based Ethics Instruction
Department or Administrative Unit
Case-based instruction has been regarded by many as a viable alternative to traditional lecture-based education and training. However, little is known about how case-based training techniques impact training effectiveness. This study examined the effects of two such techniques: (a) presentation of alternative outcome scenarios to a case, and (b) conducting a structured outcome evaluation. Consistent with the hypotheses, results indicate that presentation of alternative outcome scenarios reduced knowledge acquisition, reduced sense-making and ethical decision-making strategy use, and reduced decision ethicality. Conducting a structured outcome evaluation had no impact on these outcomes. Results indicate that those who use case-based instruction should take care to use clear, less complex cases with only a singular outcome if they are seeking these types of outcomes.
Peacock, J., Harkrider, L. N., Bagdasarov, Z., Connelly, S., Johnson, J. F., Thiel, C. E., MacDougall, A. E., Mumford, M. D., & Devenport, L. D. (2013). Effects of alternative outcome scenarios and structured outcome evaluation on case-based ethics instruction. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 1283–1303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9402-7
Science and Engineering Ethics
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012
This article was originally published in Science and Engineering Ethics. The full-text article from the publisher can be found here.
Due to copyright restrictions, this article is not available for free download from ScholarWorks @ CWU.