Two Definitional Issues with the Patton-Nelson Personal Consumption Tables: A Reply
Response or Comment
Department or Administrative Unit
In the preceding issue of this Journal (2007), Kurt Krueger commented on two definitional issues related to the use of the "Patton-Nelson Personal Consumption Tables 2005-06," (PNPC) (2007) that were included in that same issue. Krueger states "This comment discusses two definitional issues with the PNPC estimates that readers should be aware of before applying them to a wrongful death case." (p. 251)
This reply attempts to clarify Krueger's definitional issues so that users of the PNPC get a full view of the impact of his comments on the application of the PNPC.
Ruble, M.R., Patton, M.T. & Nelson, D.M. (2009). Two definitional issues with the Patton-Nelson Personal Consumption Tables: A reply. Journal of Forensic Economics 21(1), 109-112. DOI: 10.5085/0898-5510-21.1.109
Journal of Forensic Economics
Copyright © 2009 National Association of Forensic Economics