Going Against the Grain Works: An Attributional Perspective of Perceived Ethical Leadership
Department or Administrative Unit
This study provides an attributional perspective to the ethical leadership literature by examining the role of attributed altruistic motives and perceptions of organizational politics in a moderated mediation model. Path analytic tests from two field studies were used for analyses. The results support our hypotheses that attributed altruistic motives would mediate the relationship between perceived ethical leadership and affective organizational commitment. Moreover, the relationship between perceived ethical leadership and attributed altruistic motives was stronger when perceptions of organizational politics were high but weaker when these perceptions were low. The study concludes with a discussion of future research implications as well as managerial implications.
Li, C., Wu, K., Johnson, D. E., & Avey, J. (2015). Going Against the Grain Works: An Attributional Perspective of Perceived Ethical Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2698-x
Journal of Business Ethics
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015
This article was originally published in Journal of Business Ethics. The full-text article from the publisher can be found here.
Due to copyright restrictions, this article is not available for free download from ScholarWorks @ CWU.