The optimality of non-additive approaches for portfolio selection
Document Type
Article
Department or Administrative Unit
Computer Science
Publication Date
9-15-2011
Abstract
The selection of assets in which to invest money is of critical importance in the finance industry, and is rendered very treacherous because of the inherent market fluctuations, and the connections with the Economy, and major world events. Because of the high dimensionality of the problem of selecting an optimal portfolio (in the financial sense of, a portfolio outperforming other portfolios), and the large amount of data available, intelligent systems (e.g. artificial intelligence techniques, machine learning approaches) are a natural approach to tackle this problem, from a computational standpoint. Numerous techniques have been developed to combine the values of return, risk, and other characteristics of an asset. However, the majority of techniques that have been used to construct a portfolio, tend to ignore dependencies among the characteristics of an asset. Moreover, most of the techniques assume that all available data are precise, which is not the case since, for instance, the expected return of an asset is a prediction of future behavior. To address these drawbacks, it was proposed in Magoc, Modave, Ceberio, and Kreinovich (2009) to use non-additive (or fuzzy) methods. Fuzzy methods outperformed other techniques, at least in the case of the Shanghai market, where full disclosure of information is assumed. In this paper, we give an intuition why fuzzy approach performs very well in this particular finance problem.
Recommended Citation
Magoč, T., & Modave, F. (2011). The optimality of non-additive approaches for portfolio selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12967–12973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.093
Journal
Expert Systems with Applications
Rights
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comments
This article was originally published in Expert Systems with Applications. The full-text article from the publisher can be found here.
Due to copyright restrictions, this article is not available for free download from ScholarWorks @ CWU.