Mentoring our young reviewers: learning from our learning curve

Document Type

Editorial

Department or Administrative Unit

Mathematics

Publication Date

10-17-2021

Abstract

The peer review process is critical for rigorous scientific inquiry. Articles published in peer-reviewed journals inform clinical practice and guideline development. However, distinguishing good science from bad science is not straightforward and is far from perfect. Moreover, finding qualified peer reviewers has been the Achilles heel of medical journals. Mentoring young reviewers can fill this gap. Herein we present our experience with our Peer Review Mentorship program.

Comments

This article was originally published in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The full-text article from the publisher can be found here.

Due to copyright restrictions, this article is not available for free download from ScholarWorks @ CWU.

Journal

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Copyright

© 2021 by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Share

COinS